Yeah, I did the scans differently from usual. Usually I go for a balance between quality and size, which has meant scanning was done as JPG and also resampling to cut the pixels in half (think 2800×2800 down to 1400×1400, cuts the file size to ¼ of what it was). This time I did the scans as PNG and did not resample, that combined with the larger than typical area being scanned meant big files. As solomax mentioned, I batch converted the PNGs to JPGs for the MP3 torrent. They’re still not resampled but 567 MB is a little more manageable than 1.1 GB, and you could always resample them to save space regardless.
This was pretty much an experiment to see if people prefer these types of scans going forward. Or maybe people would prefer I continued resampling. If anyone has an opinion let me know.
No worries from me. I’m just a cheap weeb who want as small as possible in size except for the songs. Others may want the best quality available so that’s fine too.
well I don’t mind about size of the file because I have lots of storage to load
about 300Tb of Space :D :D
I prefer the quality and optimizing of a file
Comments - 15
siba
Damn, 1 GB just for the scans. I just gonna grab disc 1-3 along with 720p of the clip to save some space.
Thanks a lot.
Dophirus
you’re a god ! thank you very much !
solomax
Seeding all 4 torrents, thanks as always!
Also, @siba, scans are JPG and half the size of the PNG scans in the MP3 torrent.
EinsamerWanderer (uploader)
Yeah, I did the scans differently from usual. Usually I go for a balance between quality and size, which has meant scanning was done as JPG and also resampling to cut the pixels in half (think 2800×2800 down to 1400×1400, cuts the file size to ¼ of what it was). This time I did the scans as PNG and did not resample, that combined with the larger than typical area being scanned meant big files. As solomax mentioned, I batch converted the PNGs to JPGs for the MP3 torrent. They’re still not resampled but 567 MB is a little more manageable than 1.1 GB, and you could always resample them to save space regardless.
This was pretty much an experiment to see if people prefer these types of scans going forward. Or maybe people would prefer I continued resampling. If anyone has an opinion let me know.
siba
No worries from me. I’m just a cheap weeb who want as small as possible in size except for the songs. Others may want the best quality available so that’s fine too.
Thanks for solomax for pointing the jpg files.
bertokeren
Damn, thanks for this masterpiece, my comrade… (۶ꈨຶꎁꈨຶ )۶ʸᵉᵃʰᵎ
1753
well I don’t mind about size of the file because I have lots of storage to load
about 300Tb of Space :D :D
I prefer the quality and optimizing of a file
aqku
Thanks!
supercoolman
1GB Scan isn’t really that big of a deal
I’m actually also looking for the BDMV, but it’s missing from this torrent
SomaHeir
Sawano Goodness!!
harley0726
Thanks a lot
NotReallyABot
Sounds like they added some extra reverb effect to the tracks in this album, feels a little weird…
twelve-sama
Thanks for the upload. Any chance you can do a 96khz upload if the source material goes up to that quality?
EinsamerWanderer (uploader)
Sorry, twelve-sama, I only buy CDs.
Phantom132
*appreciation